Posts Tagged ‘Republican Lawmakers’

Childrens Health Plan Schip Renewed by Senate

January 10th, 2010

The honorable position should be that all children should have access to health care and medical treatment.  Republican lawmakers didn’t like a certain provision in the bill which allowed legal immigrants to enroll in SCHIP.  Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi questioned whether the real intent of the legislation was to replace private health care with a government run system.  Democratic Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois saw it a bit differently, when he advised that the debate was about children’s health care, and was not a debate about immigration.

Childrens Health Plan Schip Renewed by Senate

December 26th, 2009

SCHIP was just renewed again by the US Senate, but the Republican party fought tooth and nail against it.  The honorable position should be that all children should have access to health care and medical treatment.  But apparently not all lawmakers agree.  Since 1997 the SCHIP program has provided health coverage to millions of children who need medical care, as some in Congress wish to deny them basic care, while continuing to blame their parents for being unable to provide that coverage.

President Obama has indicated he will sign the bill, which was approved by both the House and the Senate.  The Washington Post reported that the Senate passed the bill by 66 to 32, a more than two to one margin, but still certain legislators on the Republican side felt slighted.

Republican lawmakers didn’t like a certain provision in the bill which allowed legal immigrants to enroll in SCHIP.  They wanted to continue to force the legal immigrants to wait five years before they become eligible.  The prior bill presented to Congress had this provision omitted, but it was added back in this time by the Democratic majority.

The debate in the chamber apparently wasn’t a calm one.  Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah stated that the addition of the provision was a slap in the face of those who had worked with the other side.  He added that without the provision it could have passed with 95 votes.

Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi questioned whether the real intent of the legislation was to replace private health care with a government run system.  Democratic Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois saw it a bit differently, when he advised that the debate was about children’s health care, and was not a debate about immigration.

If you are recently without health insurance, the challenge of finding coverage can be daunting. The specialists at www.InsureLane.com can provide you with multiple health insurance quotes in just a matter of minutes. Let them assist you with easy answers to your difficult questions.




By: Ethan Kalvin

Republicans Try to Hinder Children’s Health Bill

November 13th, 2009

In America, Barack Obama’s plans to extend health insurance have been met with some opposition by Republican lawmakers.

The Republican’s have been attempting to slow the proposal from materialising by arguing that a bill in the Senate would draw around 2.4 million away from private health insurance onto government – sponsored coverage.

Overall, the Senate legislation would increase spending by $31.5 billion over the next 4 ½ years. The expansion would be paid for by increasing the federal excise tax and tobacco products.

However, Sen. Jon Kyl said that the plan does not do enough to limit the State Children’s Health Insurance Programme to low-income families.

Kyl noted that around a third of those who gain insurance as a result of the bill would otherwise have access to private health insurance. He stated: “We’re going to replace a lot of private insurance with government insurance.”

Sen. Richard Durbin, responded to the critics that those arguing the scheme were too generous to middle-income families  and are “really out of touch with what these families face.”

Helping those achieve health insurance

SCHIP was founded in 1997, and is a federal-state partnership for families who financially have too much to qualify for Medicaid but struggle to afford private medical insurance.

States have broad flexibility to determine desirable candidates, and Republicans say states like New York and New Jersey are broadening the program to families with incomes that exceed the need for government assistance.

Although the Republican’s strength is their opinions, their weakness is their numbers, as they lack the votes to block the legislation as Democrats have reinforced their majorities in Congress.

Therefore, the Senate and House members will have to work out the difference in the legislation, before Barack Obama can sign the bill.

The House passed a comparable bill nearly two weeks ago by a vote of 289-129. Forty Republican’s voted in favour to the measure.

What Barack Obama is advocating is new to America. In 2007, former President George W. Bush twice vetoed Democratic-led bills to expand children’s health insurance cover. Obama has said he hopes the Senate will act with urgency so the new bill can be reauthorized and expanded.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid commented on Bush’s decision to ban an expansion: “Jeopardizing the health of American children is not a political victory for anyone. It’s a loss for everyone. It’s long past time that we corrected it.”

Sen. Max Baucus is also a supporter of SCHIP by stating that the number of uninsured children has been cut by a third due to the programme and claims that the new bill would mean families with higher incomes would get less funding from the federal government than they would normally get via SCHIP.

To pay for the plan’s expansion, lawmakers have proposed increasing the federal excise tax on a pack of cigarettes to $1. That is a 61 cent increase. Baucus said this will be a plus: “Increasing the cigarette tax will discourage smoking, particularly among teens. And that will be good for kids, too.”




By: catherine